Scott Davis · More than 30 years in IT

I help make complicated technology work.

I’ve spent more than 30 years building, running, fixing, and improving the systems organizations depend on.

Some days that means writing code or automating work people are doing by hand. Sometimes it means figuring out why a system isn’t working, deciding how a new one should work, or explaining to a leader why the expensive answer may not be the right one.

A lot of the time I’m doing more than one of those.

AI has changed how much of that work I can take on myself. It helps me learn unfamiliar tools while I’m working, write code, compare approaches, and get from an idea to something real much faster.

The part I still own is figuring out what we’re actually trying to accomplish and whether the result makes sense.

What do I actually do?

Most of my background is in enterprise IT: infrastructure, storage, virtualization, data protection, systems, security, recovery, and the automation around them.

But my job has rarely stopped at the technology.

I’ve led teams, run a hospital IT department, owned a managed-services business, worked in large energy and financial-services environments, managed vendors and budgets, and been responsible for systems other people depended on.

Today I spend a lot of my time taking work people are doing manually and figuring out how to make it repeatable, controlled, and easier for someone else to run.

Sometimes I’m building the solution.

Sometimes I’m working through the architecture.

Sometimes I’m helping people figure out what they really need before anybody builds anything.

I can get down into the code and infrastructure, but I can also explain the same problem to the person responsible for the business decision.

That combination is probably the best answer to what I do.

AI changed how much I can do myself.

I can start solving a problem without first spending six months learning every tool involved.

AI helps me research the unfamiliar parts, understand documentation, write code, troubleshoot, compare options, and test what we’ve built.

I’ve used it for enterprise infrastructure automation, operational reporting, web applications, apps that helped run a 200-person encampment, cemetery records volunteers can reach from a phone, and even an iOS application.

That doesn’t mean I suddenly know everything.

I still have to recognize when we’re making something too complicated, when a permission doesn’t work the way we thought, when a test is checking the wrong thing, or when something says it worked but didn’t actually accomplish the job.

AI can help me figure out how a tool works.

I still have to figure out whether we’re doing something sensible with it.

Executive | Architecture | Technical

Same problem. Different questions.

An executive and an engineer may be looking at the same system and need completely different information. That’s why the case studies on this site have three views.

Same work. Same facts. Pick the level you want.

Case Studies

Here’s some of the work.

All case studies

Things I’m still thinking about.

Sometimes the interesting part of a job is what it changes about the way I think afterward.

A test rejects good work. A successful request hides an email that never arrived. A manual process turns into something much more useful once I stop thinking about it as just a manual process.

Field Notes are where I work through those things and what I think I learned from them.

Read Field Notes

Got something complicated?

Start with the problem.

If you’ve got a technology problem, an automation idea, a system that has gotten too complicated, or something you know should work better but aren’t sure what the answer is yet, that’s usually the kind of thing I enjoy.

Tell me what you’re trying to do and where you’re stuck.

Talk with Scott